<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portugese Fraudster Nuno Alves – UFO Magazine Gets It Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/</link>
	<description>Truth or Fiction?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dube</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>Nuno, I will look at the link you&#039;ve offered to see if there&#039;s any real evidence there that supports your claim. However, for defamation, Pepe&#039;s claims about you would have to be maliciously false. It appears to me that in his article he simply said that you are intentionally making false claims about UFOs, and he provided supporting evidence related to your behavior, and the behavior of your supporters, that further proves his case. Secondly, I have only re-published what he wrote. Have you taken this up with Pepe, and has he agreed to recant his article?  If you think I am going to censor his opinion because of your threats, you are taking the wrong approach. We adhere to the truth here, not to threats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuno, I will look at the link you&#8217;ve offered to see if there&#8217;s any real evidence there that supports your claim. However, for defamation, Pepe&#8217;s claims about you would have to be maliciously false. It appears to me that in his article he simply said that you are intentionally making false claims about UFOs, and he provided supporting evidence related to your behavior, and the behavior of your supporters, that further proves his case. Secondly, I have only re-published what he wrote. Have you taken this up with Pepe, and has he agreed to recant his article?  If you think I am going to censor his opinion because of your threats, you are taking the wrong approach. We adhere to the truth here, not to threats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno Alves</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno Alves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>I disagree. Pepe Chaves has not done any research and is based on lies to make false statements in order incrimitatórias. The same is done with elements of UFO Magazine in Brazil. I think we should have carefully investigated the matter where they are proven, including people who were close to the occurrence. One of these people is a magazine journalist aviation. Somehow ended up collaborating with the publication of a defamatory matter, which has nothing really. It was just a war created by the author Pepe Chaves, Nuno Alves that I collaborate with UFO Magazine. I still do my job very seriously and honesty that is essential for a healthy Ufology. It was for this reason that this time I was forced by police to enable measures where measures will be taken of the respective disposal sites that you want to edit these slanders like it or not, are computer crimes. The same advances on compensatory measures for moral damages. You should not use the Internet to where they made ​​defamatory charges without evidence or simply invent false evidence. You certainly would not want to be accused of something they never did. Fortunately there are many people who support me in this arduous research.
I was warned by friends that this site was publishing defamation about me. Anyway to your question and recommend carefully reading the article about the Netherlands. Are all the evidence disclosed. It&#039;s what we have right now and it is not fake or inventions as Pepe says Chaves. Before you judge, I think one should determine the two sides of the coin in order to avoid taking errors.

Att
Nuno Alves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. Pepe Chaves has not done any research and is based on lies to make false statements in order incrimitatórias. The same is done with elements of UFO Magazine in Brazil. I think we should have carefully investigated the matter where they are proven, including people who were close to the occurrence. One of these people is a magazine journalist aviation. Somehow ended up collaborating with the publication of a defamatory matter, which has nothing really. It was just a war created by the author Pepe Chaves, Nuno Alves that I collaborate with UFO Magazine. I still do my job very seriously and honesty that is essential for a healthy Ufology. It was for this reason that this time I was forced by police to enable measures where measures will be taken of the respective disposal sites that you want to edit these slanders like it or not, are computer crimes. The same advances on compensatory measures for moral damages. You should not use the Internet to where they made ​​defamatory charges without evidence or simply invent false evidence. You certainly would not want to be accused of something they never did. Fortunately there are many people who support me in this arduous research.<br />
I was warned by friends that this site was publishing defamation about me. Anyway to your question and recommend carefully reading the article about the Netherlands. Are all the evidence disclosed. It&#8217;s what we have right now and it is not fake or inventions as Pepe says Chaves. Before you judge, I think one should determine the two sides of the coin in order to avoid taking errors.</p>
<p>Att<br />
Nuno Alves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dube</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>Nuno - &quot;prestige&quot; is not what makes someone legitimate. There are plenty of prestigious people int he world that are also scam artists. The real question is whether or not Pepe&#039;s investigation holds up - and in all honesty it does.  

I&#039;ll tell you what, if you can disprove this, &quot;None of the researchers in Portugal were able to obtain a single piece of evidence, or even a single clue, that a UFO had ever crashed in the Netherlands.&quot;

If you have evidence that shows that statement is invalid, please present it to me at ryan-at-topsecretwriters.com. If your evidence is validated as true, I will take down this article. 

When you contact Informatics, please make sure to tell them about the fact that you claim to have witnessed a UFO crash, but you can&#039;t provide any evidence. I&#039;m sure that will go over well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuno &#8211; &#8220;prestige&#8221; is not what makes someone legitimate. There are plenty of prestigious people int he world that are also scam artists. The real question is whether or not Pepe&#8217;s investigation holds up &#8211; and in all honesty it does.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what, if you can disprove this, &#8220;None of the researchers in Portugal were able to obtain a single piece of evidence, or even a single clue, that a UFO had ever crashed in the Netherlands.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you have evidence that shows that statement is invalid, please present it to me at ryan-at-topsecretwriters.com. If your evidence is validated as true, I will take down this article. </p>
<p>When you contact Informatics, please make sure to tell them about the fact that you claim to have witnessed a UFO crash, but you can&#8217;t provide any evidence. I&#8217;m sure that will go over well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dube</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-3099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-3099</guid>
		<description>Let me ask you this Ivan - are you saying there are no fraudsters that have ever used Roswell to create a scam? Pepe may be skeptic, but he handled this case well and I was impressed with his final piece. You may not like the fact that he is a skeptic, but the evidence he gathered for this article is good, and the logic in his conclusion is sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask you this Ivan &#8211; are you saying there are no fraudsters that have ever used Roswell to create a scam? Pepe may be skeptic, but he handled this case well and I was impressed with his final piece. You may not like the fact that he is a skeptic, but the evidence he gathered for this article is good, and the logic in his conclusion is sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno Alves</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno Alves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>This site will be reported to authorities Informatics, by the simple fact that he is committing a crime of encouragement and defamation.
 Should be ashamed for his attitude in putting this kind of defamation without any prior analysis as the author of the UFOV viafanzine has no prestige or morality before the research community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This site will be reported to authorities Informatics, by the simple fact that he is committing a crime of encouragement and defamation.<br />
 Should be ashamed for his attitude in putting this kind of defamation without any prior analysis as the author of the UFOV viafanzine has no prestige or morality before the research community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan-ufo</title>
		<link>http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2009/05/portugese-fraudster-nuno-alves-ufo-magazine-gets-it-wrong/#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan-ufo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topsecretwriters.com/?p=52#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>The case occurred in the Netherlands was real. I do not understand how they define this case a fake! Does Roswell was also fake? Pepe Chaves author of the article is a polemic in nature person trying to discredit all the good researchers. I know the work of the Portuguese Nuno Alves, and are all very well prepared. I think this site is to drive the wrong way to cause discredit to a person who has offered much in this area. I&#039;m shocked at how this person can believe Pepe Chaves! It is simply ridiculous and pointless to try incubrir be a real case, also investigated by others.The author of this accommodation should have a special attention to establish facts before proceeding with this type of publication. What happened in the Netherlands was not a real fake. These attitudes like those of Pepe and who published this article discredited what happened in Holland, that sink the UFO study. I recommend to read carefully all the work of Nuno Alves, which presents evidence on the subject. Pepe has no longer anything but insults and defamatory words.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case occurred in the Netherlands was real. I do not understand how they define this case a fake! Does Roswell was also fake? Pepe Chaves author of the article is a polemic in nature person trying to discredit all the good researchers. I know the work of the Portuguese Nuno Alves, and are all very well prepared. I think this site is to drive the wrong way to cause discredit to a person who has offered much in this area. I&#8217;m shocked at how this person can believe Pepe Chaves! It is simply ridiculous and pointless to try incubrir be a real case, also investigated by others.The author of this accommodation should have a special attention to establish facts before proceeding with this type of publication. What happened in the Netherlands was not a real fake. These attitudes like those of Pepe and who published this article discredited what happened in Holland, that sink the UFO study. I recommend to read carefully all the work of Nuno Alves, which presents evidence on the subject. Pepe has no longer anything but insults and defamatory words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.topsecretwriters.com @ 2012-02-09 15:36:18 -->
