Please enable Javascript to use Top Secret Writers to it's fullest. Without it, you will find much of the modern internet doesn't work. I would add a little button hide this message, but that kind of functionality requires Javascript ;)

Proof That Weather Modification is Happening Under Our NosesPrevious Article
Utah Airline Crew UFO Sighting Supported by FAA RadarNext Article

Should Military Weapons Ever Be Fully Automated?

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print This Article
Should Military Weapons Ever Be Fully Automated?
Are real-life terminators, autonomous robots, designed to go into combat, identify the enemy, and then kill them, on the horizon? According to a recent story in Ars Technica (1), the United States military is at least considering the idea.

But using robots to perform combat missions, including the use of deadly force, involves a number of technical and ethical questions. A campaign to ban autonomous killer robots has already been mounted, with the idea of a United Nations treaty to forbid their use.

The military has been killing the enemy by remote control for over ten years. Predator drones (2) equipped with Hellfire missiles have proven to be useful weapons to surgically take out terrorists in remote locations. Drone operators stay in safety thousands of miles away from the combat zone, fly the drones to the target and, when the rules of engagement are met, fire a missile, taking out the terrorists.

Even though human operators are in the loop, the use of remote-controlled drones has not been without its problems. On occasion, drone strikes have caused what the military calls “collateral damage” (i.e. civilian casualties).

Also, some drone operators have come down with a form of PTSD, brought on by the dichotomy of performing assassinations inside a control room and then going after a shift to a familiar home and family without time to decompress from the psychological stress.




Beyond Human Operated Drones

Having either aerial drones or even land rover robots being able to act autonomously is a technological step beyond a human-operated drone. The idea is that these weapons platforms would be inserted into a combat zone for a predefined mission but would be programmed to determine on their own who to kill and who to allow to live.

The problem with remote drones is that they have to be controlled by a satellite communications network and, if such is disrupted, they become useless. Autonomous killer robots do not have that problem.

Robots do not get killed or maimed or suffer from PTSD. If they are destroyed, they are not mourned by families and friends. They do not get angry, nor do they tire. They continue until they complete the mission or until they are destroyed or crippled by an enemy.

Leaving aside the scenario presented in the film “The Terminator” (3), in which autonomous killer robots go berserk and start committing mass genocide, a number of groups have raised objections to the very concept. The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots (4) believes that a number of ethical issues exist with the use of these kinds of weapons.

First, no amount of programming will impart to a robot the ability to make ethical judgments on the battlefield. Robots, in the view of the group, will not be able to accurately distinguish between enemy combatants and civilians and will not be able to judge proportionality. Experts in artificial intelligence (5) may disagree with this assessment.

predator and hellfire

Lowering War’s Threshold

The second objection is that robot warriors lower the threshold to going to war. One consideration that makes governments pause before ordering their soldiers into combat is the prospect of having too many young men and women coming home in body bags.

The issues have to be considered worth it before accepting that casualties will result. With autonomous robots making decisions, war becomes too “neat and painless,” in the words of Captain James T. Kirk.

However, an article in IEEE Spectrum (6) points out that attempts to ban killer robots will likely be ineffective. Countries such as Iran and North Korea and terrorist groups such as ISIS will cheerfully ignore such a ban. The cost of building robot warriors will be low enough that almost anyone could make such a weapon. The same delivery drone that brings a package from Amazon can just as easily deliver a bomb.

Besides, software that can allow a killer robot to perform a mission more easily, more ethically, and with fewer casualties than fallible, emotional humans will sooner or later be developed. The question, therefore, is not whether using robot soldiers is inherently a bad thing, but whether it is less wrong than using human soldiers.
In any case, the argument is not likely to be settled anytime soon.

References & Image Credits:
(1) ARS Technica
(2) How Stuff Works
(3) IMDB
(4) Stop Killer Robots
(5) TSW: Stanford Conducts Century Long Study of Artificial Intelligence
(6) IEEE
(7) AC-208 Fires Hellfire
(8) Image of Predator and Hellfire

Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com

United States Military

Operation Highjump: When the US Militarized Antarctica

Operation Highjump: When the US Militarized Antarctica

In 1946, the year after the conclusion of World War II, the United States Navy undertook a major military, exploration, and scientific expedition to Antarctica(1) called Operation Highjump. (more…) [...]


"The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks."
― Christopher Hitchens

Top Secret Editors

Ryan is the founder of Top Secret Writers. He is an IT analyst, blogger, journalist, and a researcher for the truth behind strange stories.
 
Lori is TSW's editor. Freelance writer and editor for over 17 years, she loves to read and loves fringe science and conspiracy theory.

Top Secret Writers

Gabrielle is a journalist who finds strange stories the media misses, and enlightens readers about news they never knew existed.
 
Sally is TSW's health/environmental expert. As a blogger/organic gardener, she's investigates critical environmental issues.
 
Mark Dorr grew up the son of a treasure hunter. His experiences led to working internationally in some surprising situations!
 
Mark R. Whittington, from Houston, Texas, frequently writes on space, science, political commentary and political culture.
 
Jeri Simpson is an American writer living in Baja, Mexico interested in gathering information and sharing it with TSW readers.

Join Other Conspiracy Theory Researchers on Facebook!

Get a Top Secret Bumper Sticker!

Comment on Breaking Stories

Powered by Disqus