Please enable Javascript to use Top Secret Writers to it's fullest. Without it, you will find much of the modern internet doesn't work. I would add a little button hide this message, but that kind of functionality requires Javascript ;)

How I Became a Conspiracy Theorist and Lived to Tell the TalePrevious Article
Are UK Horse Mutilations Satanic Cults or Something Worse?Next Article

FDA Says It Is Safe To Eat Gulf Seafood Again

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print This Article
FDA Says It Is Safe To Eat Gulf Seafood Again

The FDA has declared that Gulf seafood is now as safe as it was before the Deepwater Horizon oil spill of April 2010.

This accident caused an unbelievable amount of damage. Could it really be restored in less than two years?

In order to determine the safety of Gulf seafood, the FDA has tested polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs. They chose this method of testing because PAHs stay in seafood longer than other hydrocarbons.

If the level of PAHs is low, then it can be concluded that other hydrocarbons are lower.

Over 10,000 specimens were tested for levels at 100 times lower than the levels of concern, as well as levels at 1000 times lower.

They found that 99% of the samples tested had no detectable residue.

Levels are so low that Michael Taylor, FDA deputy commissioner for foods, stated:

“Someone could eat 63 lbs of peeled shrimp (that’s 1,575 jumbo shrimp); or 5 lbs. of oyster meat (that’s 130 individual oysters); or 9 lbs. of fish (that’s 18 8-ounce fish filets) every day for five years and still not reach the levels of concern.” (1)




Unfortunately, the FDA also told us that Gulf seafood was safe to eat only a few months after the disaster that dumped millions of gallons of crude oil and dispersants into the Gulf of Mexico.

At that time, their testing methods were heavily criticized, and shown to leave out important factors. Testing included a “smell test”, as well as a test for dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate.

However, that early FDA testing completely ignored the possibility of other toxic chemicals.

Fishermen didn’t buy the claims and did not return to their livelihood, claiming that the FDA efforts to clear the seafood were simply a tactic to protect BP from compensating those in the fishing industry for their losses.

Environmental attorney Stuart Smith said, “I believe the government and BP are trying to downplay the damage.”

He said if they were successful, fishermen would not be fully compensated for their losses.

gulf seafood

Other Contaminants Still Ignored by the FDA

The latest testing searched for dangerous levels of PAHs, and PAHs are indeed very toxic, but according to William Sawyer, a Florida-based toxicologist, testing for PAHs just wasn’t enough.

His own testing had found long-chain “aliphatic” hydrocarbons at levels twice as high as is considered safe. Daily exposure to such high levels causes a risk for liver damage.

Surprisingly, the government refused to recognize this, because of the safe levels that had been determined by the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group back in the 90s.

The reason this information wasn’t considered applicable is because it was intended for public health officials working on hazardous waste sites and not specifically applied to food safety. (2)

The FDA made it’s standards more stringent only after they had made such a glaring error the last time they declared the “all-clear”.

Now, they insist that Gulf seafood really is completely safe to eat. Yet, a study published in Environmental health Perspectives suggested that testing should include a wider range of contaminants and not only focus on PAHs. (3)

What do you think? Do you trust the FDA’s testing methods? Will you feed your family seafood from the Gulf?

Share your thoughts in the comments section below.


Resources & Image Credits:

(1) Gulf Seafood is Safe to Eat After Oil Spill
(2) Panel challenges Gulf seafood safety all-clear
(3) A Review of Seafood Safety after the Deepwater Horizon Blowout
(4) wrdf.org
(5) The Earthy Report
(6) Steve Snodgrass via Compfight cc

Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com

  •  R410A is certainly more environmentally friendly than R22, since it does not emit hydrofluorocarbons like R22 does. Therefore R410A does not deplete the ozone layer. But this is not the only advantage. R410A is actually a better refrigerant for several reasons.

Environment

What Caused These Strange Ocean Sounds?

What Caused These Strange Ocean Sounds?

Over the past decades, various ocean sounds have been recorded that don't have any known explanation and have left scientists baffled. (more…) [...]

“The thing about the truth is, not a lot of people can handle it.” -Conor McGregor

BECOME A PATREON SUPPORTER and decide what stories we investigate!

Donate to Support TSW!





Top Secret Editors

Ryan is the founder of Top Secret Writers. He is an IT analyst, blogger, journalist, and a researcher for the truth behind strange stories.
 
Lori is TSW's editor. Freelance writer and editor for over 17 years, she loves to read and loves fringe science and conspiracy theory.

Top Secret Writers

Gabrielle is a journalist who finds strange stories the media misses, and enlightens readers about news they never knew existed.
Sally is TSW’s health/environmental expert. As a blogger/organic gardener, she’s investigates critical environmental issues.
Mark Dorr grew up the son of a treasure hunter. His experiences led to working internationally in some surprising situations!
Mark R. Whittington, from Houston, Texas, frequently writes on space, science, political commentary and political culture.

Join Other Conspiracy Theory Researchers on Facebook!

Get a Top Secret Bumper Sticker!

Comment on Breaking Stories

Powered by Disqus