Please enable Javascript to use Top Secret Writers to it's fullest. Without it, you will find much of the modern internet doesn't work. I would add a little button hide this message, but that kind of functionality requires Javascript ;)

 Israeli Skunk Spray: Just More Palestinian Harassment?Previous Article
Could There Be Undiscovered Treasure Off Florida's Coasts?Next Article

FactCheck.org Isn’t Always Right: Wrong on US-Supplied Drug Cartel Guns

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print This Article
FactCheck.org Isn’t Always Right: Wrong on US-Supplied Drug Cartel Guns
In 2009, Factcheck.org published an online article by D’Angelo Gore called “Counting Mexico’s Guns”. President Obama had claimed 90 percent of weapons recovered in Mexico came from the United States. Fox News claimed it was more like 17 percent.

While the article spent its time examining the claims, the author wriggles around conjuring magical numbers, eventually getting to around 37 percent minimum. However, he is still unsure of that number, and as he could not get definitive statistics. He ends with a rather wistful comment:

“Whether the number is 90 percent or 36 percent, or something else, there’s no dispute that thousands of guns are being illegally transported into Mexico by way of the United States each year.” (1)

Forgive me for saying “No s### Sherlock.”

Gore (no relation to Al) had made his comments before the Government Accountability Office report came out in June 2009. The report estimated that indeed the numbers were less, by two percent, hardly proving D’Angelo correct.

Yet this is not the point here, the issue is accountability. Were writers at TSW to make estimated guesses (something we have to do from time to time), coming back and clarifying the record is important to us.

Yet Factcheck or Gore with oodles more cash and contacts than TSW do not see fit to amend the article. This is counter to what they say they fulfill for the public with “facts”. In reality Factcheck, while popular and critically acclaimed, offers only a surface look at the opinions surrounding important issues in the United States. (2)




Allegations of Bias

Due to the above factual arrogance, I decided to look into allegations concerning Factcheck’s purported liberal bias. Obama has links to the Annenberg Foundation, the organization that runs the site also runs Factcheck. He also fronted the foundation’s Chicago Annenberg Challenge seeking to remodel Chicago’s schools from 1995-1999. (3)

Journalist Brooks Jackson and Annenberg’s Kathleen Hall Jamieson (who supported Jackson’s anti-spin initiatives) were responsible for creating Factcheck.org, in 2003. (4)

Jamieson seems to be rather liberal while Jackson appears rather conservative. (5) (6) However, he is certainly not a neo-conservative and was critical of the Bush administration.

Thus, one suspects the only real bias at Factcheck concerns Jackson’s ego and serving an all too shallow political agenda. Jackson’s organization, as we have seen, still uses the same inaccurate US weapons in Mexico story.

Moreover, there is no Q&A discussion concerning Holder’s Department of Justice such as “Q: Did Eric Holder endorse the sale of guns to Mexican Criminals?”

Why can’t Factcheck grow some balls and ask was the “Fast and Furious” operation a means by which to destabilize the Mexican Government. Now, wouldn’t that be an interesting question on Factcheck. (7) (8) (9)

question mark

Why No Examination of Cause and Effect

Defenders of Factcheck would probably say, international issues are not the disputes they seek to balance.

Surely, the corresponding rise in migrants over the years from all over Latin America has had a direct effect on US domestic policy, policing, labor laws and political spin. What role if any, has the United States played in this?

Factcheck seldom sees fit to challenge the status quo, let alone correct their facts and discuss/analyse the bigger picture. This alone displays a bias that ultimately serves no one.

References & Image Credits:
(1) FactCheck
(2) GAO
(3) CATO
(4) Wikipedia: Factcheck.org
(5) Free Republic
(6) Fire Dog Lake
(7) The Guardian
(8) LA Times
(9) Dedicated Tenther
(10) Leo Reynolds via Compfight cc

Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com

Stories from the Web

Why Banning Alex Jones Will Only Help His Cause

Why Banning Alex Jones Will Only Help His Cause

On Thursday, September 6th, Twitter announced that it had permanently banned Alex Jones and his media company Infowars from using the social media platform.(more…) [...]

“The thing about the truth is, not a lot of people can handle it.” -Conor McGregor

BECOME A PATREON SUPPORTER and decide what stories we investigate!

Donate to Support TSW!





Top Secret Editors

Ryan is the founder of Top Secret Writers. He is an IT analyst, blogger, journalist, and a researcher for the truth behind strange stories.
 
Lori is TSW's editor. Freelance writer and editor for over 17 years, she loves to read and loves fringe science and conspiracy theory.

Top Secret Writers

Gabrielle is a journalist who finds strange stories the media misses, and enlightens readers about news they never knew existed.
Sally is TSW’s health/environmental expert. As a blogger/organic gardener, she’s investigates critical environmental issues.
Mark Dorr grew up the son of a treasure hunter. His experiences led to working internationally in some surprising situations!
Mark R. Whittington, from Houston, Texas, frequently writes on space, science, political commentary and political culture.

Join Other Conspiracy Theory Researchers on Facebook!

Get a Top Secret Bumper Sticker!

Comment on Breaking Stories

Powered by Disqus