Please enable Javascript to use Top Secret Writers to it's fullest. Without it, you will find much of the modern internet doesn't work. I would add a little button hide this message, but that kind of functionality requires Javascript ;)

DARPA is Working on Software That Can Last a CenturyPrevious Article
Do You See Shadow People? Sleep May Not Always Be to BlameNext Article

Mass Deaths of California Seabirds: Fukushima Radiation Casualties?

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print This Article
Mass Deaths of California Seabirds: Fukushima Radiation Casualties?
It’s being called “unprecedented” and “grisly” by National Geographic. Massive waves of dead seabirds are littering the coastline of the Western US and British Columbia (BC). In January 2015, National Geographic reported that thousands of blue-footed diving seabirds (Cassin’s auklets) were washing up on the beaches from San Francisco, Washington State and all the way to central BC (1).

Many of the dead birds are juveniles and are described as being “scraggly”. The die-off is said to be the largest ever recorded. So what is happening to these birds?

Cassin’s auklets (auks) are chunky small seabirds and are found in the North Pacific. They like to nest in small burrows by digging holes in the soil or find a safe place in natural crevices. When in flight they look to many people “like a flying tennis ball” (2).

National Geographic reports that in October 2014, the young birds began to wash up on the shores of California’s Farallon Islands to Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte Islands) off central British Columbia.




50,000 to 100,000 Dead Birds

The birds found dead along the shoreline are emaciated and this has led scientists to believe that the birds have starved to death. According to the Audubon, the food source these birds depend on is found at “the bottom of the food chain” – zooplankton, tiny marine creatures like krill.

Bill Sydeman, a senior scientist with the Farallon Institute (nonprofit marine ecology) has studied Cassin’s auklets for 30 years. He told the Audubon, “If ocean conditions change, auklets might be an early warning sign.” (3)

But what is the warning? Is it radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant that’s killing off the birds’ food source? (4)

Researchers are concerned that the die-off could spread to other birds. Fish may also become victims if the problem is a lack of food sources.

In March 2015, Crosscut reported that the sea lion pups along the California coastline are dying. The pups were found to be emaciated. It’s believed that the “energy-rich copepods” have diminished, which are vital to the marine food chain (5).

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) reported in June 2015 that from January 2015 to May 2015, “California sea lion strandings were over 10 times the average stranding level for the same 5 month period, during 2004 – 2012.”

sea lion and pup

Birds Appear to Have Starved to Death

Are the deaths of seabirds and those of sea lion pups related? Is there something going on in the marine food chain?

National Geographic spoke with University of Washington seabird ecologist Julia Parrish who oversees the Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team (COASST). COASST is a 20-year program that tracks shoreline birds. When asked how many auklets had died Parrish responded, “We may be talking about 50,000 to 100,000 deaths. So far,” Parrish said.

To put the enormity of this die-off into context, out of the five largest bird die-offs recorded, the largest one recorded 11,000 birds dead.

National Geographic reported that the US Geological Survey as well as other agencies had conducted autopsies on the birds. So far, there’s been no cause of death. There hasn’t been any evidence of disease, trauma or oil coating the feathers (from an oil spill). The cause of death for now is being ruled as “starvation”.

If the birds starved to death, then what happened to their food source? Were the zooplankton killed off by disease, predators or as some have speculated, radiation from the Fukushima nuclear power plant?

Deep Sea News states that in Japan the bottom fish would be “prone to contamination because the fallout collects on the seafloor where they live.” As for the West Coast fish, it seems unlikely that they would suffer such a fate, based on the amount of radiation detected so far along the US west coast (6).

However, wide-ranging fish, such as tuna could be affected by Fukushima radioactive water. If the tuna were exposed while swimming in Japanese waters, they could arrive along the US West Coast contaminated.

tuna

Bluefin Tuna

In August 2013, Washington’s Blog reported that “More than a year ago, 15 out of 15 Bluefin tuna tested in California waters were contaminated with radioactive cesium from Fukushima.”

Bluefin tuna are known as “wide-ranging fish”. This means that blue fins “can swim back and forth between Japan and North America in a year.” Sockeye salmon also travel this wide range (7).

Oceanus Magazine states that the level of radiation in marine life isn’t a simple explanation – It’s complicated. The length of exposure to radiation, size of marine life, the radioisotopes involved, oxygen in water, salinity of water, the temperature of the water and other factors all play a part (8).

According to Oceanus, fish are able to excrete cesium and get rid of it daily. Unless the fish is continuously exposed to cesium, the tissue expels it fairly quickly by excreting it.

Beachapedia states that even two or three years after the accident radioactive water was still being released into the ocean and possibly still is. This type of continuous discharge of radiation into the water generates a continuous feed, creating radioactive water (9).

Back in Japan, The Smithsonian reported in an article titled, “Birds Are in a Tailspin Four Years After Fukushima”, that the bird population around the Fukushima-Daiichi plant is still on the decline. While the radioactivity “has dropped throughout the region” the bird population continues to show a “sharp decline” that escalates every year (10).

While this is ground zero, there are still many unknowns about the amount of radiation that leaked into the ocean and how it’s affected marine life long-range and long-term. Reassurances from scientists monitoring the radiation levels in the ocean haven’t satisfied many west coasters.

When such a massive die-off is seen, it’s only natural that people question if this isn’t the effects of Fukushima radiation.

auklet

Fukushima or the Blob?

There is a worldwide mass-mortality being seen in marine life. During the past 18 months, the west coast from Alaska to California witnessed the washing up of tens of millions of sea stars. The deaths were not linked to a virus and scientists suspect that the killer could be “uncharacteristically warm waters”.

Some scientists believe the “massive blob of warm water that heated the North Pacific in 2014” was responsible for the California drought. 2014 was recorded as being hottest year for California. The blob was not only hotter, but also stayed warm longer than any recorded.

The massive warm water spanned the Gulf of Alaska and eventually began to travel the coastline to California. The blob altered the environment that marine life depends on. It was especially unfavorable to the zooplankton. Cassin’s auklet aren’t the only birds that rely on these small fish for a food source. Other birds and fish feed on them, too.

According to National Geographic, scientists researching the Oregon coastal waters discovered “some of the tiny crustaceans at the bottom of the marine food chain were replaced by smaller species that provide less nutrition for larger animals.”

Scientists are asking why the auklets are the only species being affected if the reason is due to a food chain change.

According to National Geographic, Bill Sydeman, a senior scientist at California’s Farallon Institute predicts that this die-off “might spread to the salmon and forage fish that eat those same plankton species and then perhaps to the murres or other birds that, in turn, eat those fish.”

Whatever the cause of the Cassin’s auklets mass die-offs, it seems to be part of a larger marine life crisis being seen around the world. Scientists are still searching for answers in this latest die-off.


References & Image Credits:
(1) National Geographic
(2) Wikipedia: Cassin’s Auklet
(3) Audubon
(4) TSW: Is Fukushima Nuclear Fallout Far Worse Than Officials Admit?
(5) Crosscut
(6) Deep Sea News
(7) Washington’s Blog
(8) Oceanus
(9) Beachapedia
(10) Smithsonian Mag

Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com

  • frankfan42

    The unspoken shadow looming over this article is that our food supply is in danger. There are numerous anecdotal accounts of sailors discussing the eerie lack of marine life noted as they sail the Pacific.
    Couple this with the incredible drought in California, and the bird flu that has spread through much of the nation and one has to logically conclude that food shortages could easily be coming.
    God help us all should these trends continue and worsen.
    Perhaps it is time to begin to repent of our sins individually, and collectively and seek God– the ultimate healer of all things, including our world.

  • Gloria

    Amen to that frankjfan42

  • Voodude

    It isn’t from Fukushima. Chernobyl released more than TEN TIMES the radionuclide contamination as Fukushima. Before Fukushima, before Chernobyl, the reprocessing plant in the UK nears Sellafield has contaminated the Irish Sea with HUNDREDS of times more radionuclide contamination, than Fukushima, FOR DECADES now. No “mass die-offs” in the Irish Sea. The bomb tests contaminated the Pacific with a hundred times more radionuclide contamination than Fukushima.

  • AquarielCharm

    Chernobyl was a 30% meltdown and last for ten days. Fukushima has over 4 meltdowns that can’t be shut off, even robots die when they go in there. Chernobyl = 400 Hiroshima Bombs of radiation. Fukushima is equal to 600,000 Hiroshima bombs and rising daily. The MOX fuel in Fukushima’s reactor 3 is the worse than all the nuclear reactors on earth “combined,” causes thousands of times more chromosomal damage than uranium and will stay in the environment for millions of years, maybe longer.

Public Health

Every Ebola Conspiracy – True, False and the Unexplained

Every Ebola Conspiracy – True, False and the Unexplained

During the 2014 outbreak of Ebola, people in West Africa’s affected regions (Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea) were fearful of the medical teams that came to assist.They hid their [...]

“The thing about the truth is, not a lot of people can handle it.” -Conor McGregor

BECOME A PATREON SUPPORTER and decide what stories we investigate!

Donate to Support TSW!





Top Secret Editors

Ryan is the founder of Top Secret Writers. He is an IT analyst, blogger, journalist, and a researcher for the truth behind strange stories.
 
Lori is TSW's editor. Freelance writer and editor for over 17 years, she loves to read and loves fringe science and conspiracy theory.

Top Secret Writers

Gabrielle is a journalist who finds strange stories the media misses, and enlightens readers about news they never knew existed.
Sally is TSW’s health/environmental expert. As a blogger/organic gardener, she’s investigates critical environmental issues.
Mark Dorr grew up the son of a treasure hunter. His experiences led to working internationally in some surprising situations!
Mark R. Whittington, from Houston, Texas, frequently writes on space, science, political commentary and political culture.

Join Other Conspiracy Theory Researchers on Facebook!

Get a Top Secret Bumper Sticker!

Comment on Breaking Stories

Powered by Disqus