Please enable Javascript to use Top Secret Writers to it's fullest. Without it, you will find much of the modern internet doesn't work. I would add a little button hide this message, but that kind of functionality requires Javascript ;)

Worst Government Conspiracy Theories That Came TruePrevious Article
CIA Allegedly Responsible for Nelson Mandela's ArrestNext Article

Farmers Sue Monsanto For Roundup Allegedly Giving Them Cancer

Line Spacing+- AFont Size+- Print This Article
Farmers Sue Monsanto For Roundup Allegedly Giving Them Cancer
The controversy surrounding Monsanto’s super herbicide Roundup used on its herbicide-resistant GMO crops continues in the wake of a 2015 WHO (World Health Organization) report. The WHO report concluded that the main chemical (glyphosate) in Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup probably causes cancer. This contradicts everything the biotech giant has claimed (1).

In fact, EU Member States have delayed the renewal of glyphosate that was banned pending further investigation. That delay was met with a strong response by Monsanto. The company stated that the EU delay was “…not scientifically warranted and represents an unprecedented deviation from the EU’s legislative framework” (2).

Whose science should the general public should believe?

The WHO report carries worldwide weight and not surprisingly, many farmers suffering from cancer believe their illnesses are directly related to their constant exposure to Roundup. Some of them are turning to the courts to seek what they feel is justice.

Four Lawsuits in Nebraska

In May 2016, Press for Truth reported that four people in Nebraska, three farmers and one agronomist were taking Monsanto to court. The lawsuit alleges that Monsanto is responsible for each person’s cancer.

In addition, the lawsuit claims that the public has been intentionally misled about the dangerous side-effects by the biotech company’s herbicide Roundup.

The plaintiffs claim that their “repeated use of Roundup” and its main chemical glyphosate caused them to develop cancer. All four plaintiffs were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

According to Press for Truth, the lawsuits claim that Monsanto “‘concealed or systematically sought to discredit’ any negative research about its products” (3).

TSW told readers about Daily KOS reporter occupystephanie having attended a talk given by Monsanto’s Dr. William ‘Bill’ Moar. A key part of Dr Moar’s talking points was “Monsanto’s efforts to educate citizens about the scientific certainty of the safety of their genetically engineered products” (4).

A revealing moment followed as occupystephanie wrote, “Dr. Moar, perhaps forgetting that this was a public event, then revealed that Monsanto indeed had ‘an entire department’ (waving his arm for emphasis) dedicated to ‘debunking’ science which disagreed with theirs.”

occupy monsanto

Other Farmers Sue Monsanto

In September 2015, Reuters reported that six months following the WHO’s classification of glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” a lawsuit against Monsanto was filed in Los Angeles (5).

The plaintiff, Enrique Rubio (58) worked on farms in Texas, California and Oregon using Roundup and other pesticides. In 1995, he was diagnosed with bone cancer. This lawsuit was followed by another.

A horticultural assistant Judi Fitzgerald, 64, claimed that Roundup was responsible for her contracting leukemia, diagnosed in 2012. The lawsuit went a step further by alleging that “Monsanto intentionally misled the public and regulators about the dangers of the herbicide.”

Charla Lord, the spokesperson for Monsanto, stated that these claims were “without merit and that glyphosate is safe for humans when used as labeled.”

In 1983, the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) changed the glyphosate classification from “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Class C) to a classification of “evidence of non-carcinogenicity in humans” (Class D). According to Reuters, this reclassification came “after pressure from Monsanto” (6).

The highly controversial use of glyphosate in weed control has two very opposing sides. Nearly every study that has claimed glyphosate is dangerous for humans to use has been countered by Monsanto.

One prime example often cited is the June 2012 GMO Seralini study. “In late June 2014, GMO Seralini announced the republishing of its 2012 study that was originally published in Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT). That study, however, was ‘retracted by the editor-in-chief in November 2013 after a sustained campaign of criticism and defamation by pro-GMO scientists’.”

Dr. Jack A Heinemann, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics, University of Canterbury New Zealand later commented on the pressure made against the journal Nature to retract the 2012 report. “The first publication of these results revealed some of the viciousness that can be unleashed on researchers presenting uncomfortable findings,” he said (7).


Farmers Worldwide Suffering Effects

In August 2015, TSW reported on a study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2014) that “found a possible strong link between glyphosate and the tragic epidemic of the fatal Chronic Kidney Disease (CKDu) sweeping through the agri-centers for sugarcane, rice and other crops in the Central American (CA) countries of El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica, as well as Andhra Pradesh (India) and Sri Lanka.”

Subsequently, Sri Lanka and El Salvador “banned Monsanto’s Roundup after the study linked it to the killer CKDu, which is the second leading cause of death among males in these regions.”

As farmers step forward with lawsuits against Monsanto, another former chemical company turned biotech giant, Bayer AG (Germany), has moved to buyout the highly controversial competitor. The UPI (United Press International) reported in May 2016 that “Monsanto has been open to a corporate takeover to help resolve some financial concerns…” (8)

Monsanto rejected Bayer AG’s $62 Billion bid to buy, stating it was inadequate and “significantly undervalues our company.” However, Monsanto stated the company is open to further discussion on the possibility of a sale (9).

How things shake out will probably be as controversial as the company itself.

References & Image Credits:
(1) TSW: Why Glyphosate Bathed GMO Plants Really Are Dangerous to Your Health
(2) Monsanto
(3) Press For Truth
(4) TSW: Cancerous Monsanto Flyphosate Pesticides and the EPA Cover-Up
(5) Reuters
(6) TSW: Campaign GMO Defam Scientific Studies Roundup
(7) TSW: Monsanto Has a Department Dedicated to Discrediting Anti-GMO Scientists
(8) UPI
(9) Monsanto

Originally published on

  • Brad Jac

    Clinton is a monsanto shill


What Caused These Strange Ocean Sounds?

What Caused These Strange Ocean Sounds?

Over the past decades, various ocean sounds have been recorded that don't have any known explanation and have left scientists baffled. (more…) [...]

“The thing about the truth is, not a lot of people can handle it.” -Conor McGregor

BECOME A PATREON SUPPORTER and decide what stories we investigate!

Donate to Support TSW!

Top Secret Editors

Ryan is the founder of Top Secret Writers. He is an IT analyst, blogger, journalist, and a researcher for the truth behind strange stories.
Lori is TSW's editor. Freelance writer and editor for over 17 years, she loves to read and loves fringe science and conspiracy theory.

Top Secret Writers

Gabrielle is a journalist who finds strange stories the media misses, and enlightens readers about news they never knew existed.
Sally is TSW’s health/environmental expert. As a blogger/organic gardener, she’s investigates critical environmental issues.
Mark Dorr grew up the son of a treasure hunter. His experiences led to working internationally in some surprising situations!
Mark R. Whittington, from Houston, Texas, frequently writes on space, science, political commentary and political culture.

Join Other Conspiracy Theory Researchers on Facebook!

Get a Top Secret Bumper Sticker!

Comment on Breaking Stories

Powered by Disqus