She was referencing a single phenomenon, so plural use of the word wouldn’t make sense.
I’m not seeing any words get cut off — mind emailing me a screenshot at ryan @ topsecretwriters.com?

UFO’s are NOT aliens from other planets in the universe. They are demons from another dimension. It’s all part of the great deception.

There will be an upcoming announcement that is correct in part but not in entirety.

The Crypto-terrestrial hypothesis is interesting but not entirely sound in its “why/who/and what for” reasoning. At present, top tier US/UN parties are misunderstanding the “soul” element of the phenomenon as this pseudo-sub species would hold no requisite for a spiritual faculty in that it exists in what i understand to be as a deep negative state and somewhat polar to our own. This ps species engages with humans in a purely parasitic capacity (resource only) in a bid to successfully tier and transplant “atma” within its own distilled genetic lineage. The function of this transplant rests simply on the genetic rebooting of its own DNA profile in that it lacks no innate propulsion/striving mechanism to allow for the continual sine of evolutionary advance, i.e. the highs and lows as we experience them in our own evolutionary timeline. This pseudo sub species has, over the course of our own development, recognised its predicament and incapacity and has sought a medium in which to transcend its plateaued state . The abduction phenomenon thereby rests on the cherry picking of suitable genetic strands in humans that prove feasible in the successful migration of atma. The core of the phenomena relates largely to a species we have labelled “insectoid” although an hierarchy that involves other forms such as “greys” has much distorted our general understanding of those interfering entities. Some of these types are actual non-entities and exist in almost a satellite/automaton functionality to meet the agenda of the core species. The description of hybrids as purported by abductees are mere tier entities within the atma transplant process. The alleged interest of this pseudo-sub species in our nuclear capability/capacity is severely misunderstood as they have largely contributed to our nuclear armament and merely demonstrate their technologically superior control over this second hand knowledge.

I have provided a breakdown in information below and I consider this outline to be possibly incorrect in places but overall fundamentally correct:

1. The phenomenon has NO positives, there are NO good factors involved – period
2. The phenomenon and its relation to humanity is not slave but entirely resource bound – it is wholly parasitic
3. The phenomenon and the conflicting agendas therein cannot be stopped by any single earth force in the mechanical sense – regardless of whatever technology has been transferred/developed in the interim
4. The phenomenon cannot be determined through a single extraterrestrial agenda but many agendas exerted by numerous races over a long period of time both on earth and in relatively localised space
5. The phenomenon has used and continues to use false projections to effectively produce control systems/religious systems/doubt systems in directing human behaviour/spiritual development
5b. The phenomenon has used and continues to use false projections to effectively curb and in some cases promote negative reactions within social human behaviours towards its own set agendas
5c. The phenomenon has and continues to effectively tweak the populous in removing the flaw ie. ‘character’ gene from human DNA
5d. The phenomenon has already infiltrated the populous with numerous part-human controllers and observers
6. The phenomenon has manipulated the most fertile elements of human DNA in order to provide a robust procreative vessel – a resource and harvest for ‘atma’
6b. The phenomenon has and continues to manipulate key figures to gain socio political division, advantage, discord, thereby avoiding any harmonious/unified government – this is an anti-babel agenda
7. The phenomenon’s’ interest and periodic interference rests solely in the stocktake (not study) of human resource in the cultivation and harvest of the atma
8. The phenomenon has reached an event horizon (the US has full knowledge of this event)

I have learned the above, and more, from my own innate understanding and somewhat personal learning curve of what this phenomenon is and could be. This is a self-implemented pedagogy that has transpired over years of observation, absorption and attempts of subject understanding at variant levels. I fully understand the disinformation culture, I also understand truth indicators, and the need for both although I do not agree with those less than ethical methods employed in containing the subject.

I would like to draw your attention to the following useful resources;

1. The Platonic Theory of Form (everything is becoming but nothing actually is) and its relation to the following:
a. Upanishad text, in relation a. the atma, the Brahman and the nomenal world in going beyond the Veil of Maya
b. Schopenhauer’s interpretation and application of both of the above, with its obvious mistakes but underlying correctness in both the delivery and conclusion of mankind as a “mistake” (WAW&R). Schopenhauer understood the mono-logic of how atma can only be understood by the subject not the object.

NOTE: Having worked in a hospital I once encountered a patient who died (pneumonia) only a few hours following a brief conversation we had shared outside the X-Ray department in which he told me his life story. I had chance to witness this individuals’ body both before and after death and in doing so realised that,even with the mistakes in the text, Schopenhauer was fundamentally correct in regards to ‘atma’ (Wittgentstein also understood Schopenhauer’s cognitive assessment of the will or atma as fundamentally sound in its contextual frame). The interaction with atma and Platonic Form Theory is interesting in understanding that what humanity strives for is inevitably an innate programme error, purposely designed to limit the being in deterring the peeling back of the veil in reaching any higher dimensional plane. This contextual combination of Greek logic meeting German idealism should give you some crude grounding as to the anima and the relationship between atma (thing in itself) and the Brahman (the higher division of being – the greater whole) and our purpose in relation to both in regards to the phenomenon. When we brand the atma as ‘soul’ we conjure up and connect with pseudo-religious implications and it is important to detract from that and understand atma in its metaphysical singularity in realising the big attraction to those in need of a ‘striving’ medium. The Platonic Theory of Form is not entirely Greek wishful thinking as its grasps the tenet of innate striving… its perfect blue-print then provided a canon for Western art. In analogy, consider when the fly lays the egg within the host and it produces a maggot, a vehicle that has no concept whatsoever of the fly – its genesis- as it neither resembles, comprehends nor correlates to its form and motives and nor can it grasp its own physical reason d’etre. The maggot is little more than a blind unknowing medium for the atma in providing the primary stasis for a broader alternate state.

You should also…

2. Read Giambattista Vico and understand that history is not known only assumed. He also stated that the phenomenon manifests itself in history as being misinterpreted “poetic monsters”

3. Read Plato/Aristotle/Aurelius/Cicero in relation to the following recursive orb related dictum:
totus teres ataque rotundus

You will both notice in 5c – above – I mention human character and in the defense of humanity we must consider the boundary of being a mere utility and transcend this unwanted state not by protective weaponry but via the act of collective rebellion against the agenda. Camus, writing in the first half of the twentieth century, reminded us – as humans – the (lost) art of rebellion. Remember, the real conflict is not with the phenomenon as it chooses to manifest itself in three dimensional space but with the acknowledgment of our ability in resolving the human condition, albeit a mistake, as ours not theirs and in ascertaining more humane ways of living, of being, in the knowledge of what we believe it is to be all too human. Civilization/history is NOT wholly our narrative but merely in part and if we wish to continue as a species we must first learn to understand and scrutinise – via Vico – what is ours and what is not.

I’m not bonkers…not yet…. and I prefer not to state my identity.

Best Wishes

Vico Reader